Ellisville Red Light Camera Case Sets Stage for Review by Supreme Court

A new ruling by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District sets the stage for the City of Ellisville red light camera ordinance to be reviewed by the Missouri Supreme Court. As noted in an earlier Post  red light cameras ordinances are currently one of the most litigated  and contested areas of local government law.

Photo Red Light Camera

Photo Red Light Camera

In Edwards v. City of Ellisville, the court held that the Ellisville red light camera ordinance conflicts with state law because it regulates the same conduct as section 304.281 RSMo. The court concludes that “being present” in an intersection during a red light is the equivalent of running a red light. “Logically, a vehicle cannot travel into an intersection or fail to stop when the traffic signal is red without movement – i.e., running a red light.” Judge Odenwald did get some help from the notice by Ellisville to the alleged violator, which informed the alleged violator that: “your vehicle has proceeded into an intersection by crossing the stop line when the traffic control signal, for the direction in which your vehicle was traveling, was emitting a steady red signal” and that “red light running” endangers both drivers and pedestrians.” (Emphasis added by the court).

In addition to finding a conflict with state law that prohibits running a red light the court found that the ordinance conflicts with state law that makes running a red light a moving violation, which requires the assessment of points under A moving violation is plainly defined by state statute as “that character of traffic violation where at the time of violation the motor vehicle involved is in motion.” Section 302.010(13). “The definition of a moving violation is fundamental to the interpretation of Section 302.302, which establishes Missouri’s point system for the suspension and revocation of licenses.” The court notes that:  “Both the Ordinance and the accompanying Notice of Violation state that an infraction of the Ordinance constitutes a non-moving violation. As a consequence based on the determination that the ordinance is really “running a red light” the charge is a moving violation, in conflict with state law.

Missouri Supreme Court Weight in on Collective Bargaining

Missouri Supreme Court – It is their turn

If the Missouri Supreme Court takes Ellisville case other issues decided in favor of local government would likely be considered giving us a panoramic view of related issues to this area of the law. Stay tuned.

Howard Wright @ 2013

Advertisements
Aside | This entry was posted in Law and Policy and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s