Stop – Red Light and Speeding Cameras

This is  a good time  to review recent  developments relating to traffic camera ordinances while the Missouri Supreme Court mulls over three cases involving the city of St. Louis and two cities in St. Charles and St. Louis counties that were argued December 2, 2014. The Missouri Supreme Court  did not review  a number of earlier Court of Appeals cases that invalidated local red light camera ordinances leading to the question of why these cases are now  being reviewed. So what is up with these cases?

Missouri Supreme Court

Missouri Supreme Court

Settlement of class-action lawsuit. Recently, American Traffic Solutions,  which operated  cameras in 27 Missouri cities  settled a  class action lawsuit involving some 900,000 people who paid red light camera tickets allowing each person  a 20% cash payment for any fine  they paid between 2005 in November 2014.

What is extremely fascinating about this settlement is that the class action plaintiffs were able to obtain and  introduce  into evidence a letter from a highly respected local government attorney employed by  American Traffic Solutions  stating  “…we do not believe a constitutional charter city, or statutory city, town, or village could adopt an ordinance which circumvents the Director of Revenue’s point system for the suspension and revocation of motor vehicle licenses without the legislative authorization to do so.”

It is never a good sign when a company asks its attorney for legal advice and ignores his or her opinion. With this bombshell in hand, it is no wonder  this case was settled. Seems like the defendants got a bargain having to pay only  20 cents on the dollar and much less when you figure not everyone will file a claim.

St. Charles County voters approve Charter Amendment prohibiting use of red light cameras to enforce traffic laws.  In St. Charles County the voters approved a  Charter Amendment  in November 2014 that prohibited the use of red light cameras to enforce traffic laws  by municipalities by an overwhelming 73% of the voters. That has really led to confusion as to whether or not  St. Charles  County has the authority to limit the right of municipalities to enforce their traffic laws  by banning the use of red  light cameras, leading to a lawsuit by two municipalities against the County.   The fact that some  cities  in St. Charles County still want to enforce their red light camera ordinances has really got the natives stirred up, leading to some very fascinating comments concerning how government is organized in Missouri. Nevertheless,  all of the legal  and political jockeying  is beside the point because the referendum  clearly shows  there is very little public support for red light camera enforcement.   With  73% of the voters opposed to the use of red light cameras local government officials  will be very reluctant  to institute  or continue this  practice.

State of the Judiciary  Address  by Chief Justice Mary Russell in 2015.  Chief Justice Russell included in her State   of the Judiciary to the General Assembly    comments with respect to  municipal courts calling for improving the municipal divisions of the   Supreme Court

Chief Justice Russell, State of the Judiciary - 2015

Chief Justice Russell, State of the Judiciary – 2015

“From a local municipal division to the state Supreme Court, Missouri’s courts should be open and accessible to all. Courts should primarily exist to help people resolve their legal disputes. If they serve, instead, as revenue generators for the municipality that selects and pays the court staff and judges – this creates at least a perception, if not a reality, of diminished judicial impartiality.”

Chief Justice Russell   further stated that it is important that the municipal divisions are not driven “…by economics, but notions of fairness under the rule of law.”   She also  notes that in order to achieve the objective of  judicial impartiality it will be necessary of the General Assembly to also be involved.

While the comments of the Chief Justice would seem to be directed towards  the use of photo cameras to generate  extraordinarily large revenues for cities, I would hope that the Supreme Court would consider as part of its superintending control over the justice system  fees added to municipal court costs that have  little or no relationship to the  municipal court system.  The most recent example  is the four dollar fee added to Municipal Court costs to help pay for the retirement system of elected Sheriff’s.   It is hard to square   a fee to pay for the retirement of elected Sheriff’s in Missouri with the operation of the  municipal court system. Article I, section 14 of the Missouri Constitution calls for the courts to be “open to every person”  and to be administered without “sale, denial or delay.” The piling on of unrelated court fees to the administration of justice tears at the very core values Chief Justice Russell described in her 2015  State of the Judiciary particularly when these fees are paid involuntary and in many cases by persons who can ill afford the additional costs.

Public Policy.   Seemingly lost in the debate over the means to enforce speeding and the running of red lights is the overall public policy issues. Certainly, local government has an interest in  the enforcement of speeding laws and  the running of red  lights. Speed kills and the running of red lights by reckless and inconsiderate drivers  also takes its toll in needless  fatalities and injuries.

Photo Red Light Camera

Photo Red Light Camera

There are other ways to  improve traffic safety  that seemingly are not currently allowed under Missouri law. Treating speeding  or running a red light as an infraction without assessment   of points on a person’s drivers license with no criminal penalties using photo cameras may achieve better results than current enforcement methods while still providing due process.   I know from personal experience when driving in St. Louis that certain areas are prone to strict enforcement of the speeding laws so I slow down.  I know that if I speed up to enter an  intersection on the yellow light in order to avoid violating the law I  put myself and others at risk.

Drivers in Springfield,  Missouri are notorious  for  running red lights, therefore, a knowledgeable driver will delay entering the intersection after it turns green until after the driver has  carefully checked whether cars are  whizzing by  at terrifying speeds  while running the red light. So  when one reflects on public policy it is good to keep in mind there are other ways to improve traffic safety.

How this all   plays out  remains to be seen but an interesting stage has been set with respect to the multitude of issues generated by photo camera traffic enforcement for speeding and running of red lights. Stayed tuned.

Howard Wright © 2015

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Law and Policy and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s